Legal Opinion

State v. Saxton

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1974No. 13500PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

Gary R. Saxton seeks reversal of his conviction for passing a check for $250 without sufficient funds or credit in violation of Section 76-20-11, U.C.A.1953. Upon a trial to a jury, at which he was represented by counsel, he was convicted of the offense on August 6, 1971. He was out on bond; and he failed to appear at the time set for the imposition of sentence. A bench warrant was issued on August 26, 1971, but the defendant could not be found. He was next heard of in May 1972, when the district attorney received notice that he was incarcerated in the Federal Correction…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  2. State v. TappUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  3. In re FlintUtah Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Belt v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. FedderUtah Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. PatienceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  2. State v. YatesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  3. State v. HelmUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. LeyvaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
  5. Joseph Von Atkinson v. Samuel W. Smith, Warden, Utah State Prison, the Attorney General of the State of Utah, AdditionalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API