State v. Leyva
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Per curiam
Defendant challenges the trial court’s order denying his motion to vacate sentence, claiming the trial court had no jurisdiction over his case due to its order continuing sentencing without date and the State’s failure to file a detainer. Defendant also asserts he was denied his right to a speedy trial. We affirm.
On July 27, 1989, defendant was convicted of three counts of unlawful distribution of a controlled substance. Sentencing was scheduled for August of 1989, and defendant was released on bond. Defendant’s sentencing was continued five times. The first and second continuances were due…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Joseph F. Tinghitella v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- State v. BarefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- In re FlintUtah Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. BanksUtah Supreme Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Betterman v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Painter v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- State v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
- State v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
- Lancaster v. StubblefieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.