Legal Opinion

Gomes v. Perry

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1922No. 1376PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PERRY, J.

This is an action for damages. The plaintiff, in Ms amended declaration upon wMch with an answer of general denial the parties went to trial, alleged that on May 18, 1920, the defendants, who are husband and wife, “with *662force and arms broke and entered a certain dwelling-house” of the plaintiff (describing its location) “and then and there made a great noise and disturbance and did then and there threaten the wife and family of plaintiff with arrest and with ejecting them from said premises and did in fact eject the wife and family of this plaintiff from said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Westers Union Telegraph Co. v. CooperTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Territory of Hawaii v. SavidgeHawaii Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bolte v. Aits, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. United States v. BotelhoDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1973
  3. Watson v. BrownHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Schimmelfennig v. Grove Farm Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Chu v. Wong and SilerHawaii Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API