Legal Opinion · Dissent

Earthburners, Inc. v. County of Carlton

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 27, 1993No. C5-93-110Published

1DissentLansing, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s characterization of this issue as one of first impression and its rationale for denying the county a trial. It is well established that the failure of a local governing board to record a legally sufficient basis for denying a conditional use permit makes its decision prima facie arbitrary. See Honn v. City of Coon Rapids, 313 N.W.2d 409, 415-16 (Minn.1981). But the board is entitled to an opportunity to rebut the presumption and demonstrate a rational basis at trial with evidence and testimony limited in scope to those issues raised before the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Swanson v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Board of Supervisors v. Carver County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Kehr v. City of RosevilleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Uniprop Manufactured Housing, Inc. v. City of LakevilleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API