Legal Opinion
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Schlumberger
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 27, 1992No. 1901359PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Anadrill, Inc. (previously known as Anadrill Schlumberger).
The issues in this case concern indemnity provisions in two separate agreements between Anadrill and Mobil Oil Corporation ("MOC"), Mobil Oil Exploration and Producing Southeast, Inc. ("MOEPSI"), and Mobil Exploration and Producing Services United States, Inc. ("MEPSUS"). The three Mobil entities will collectively be referred to as "Mobil." Mobil's claim for indemnity arose from a personal injury that occurred at Mobil's dock in Theodore, Alabama.
Mobil ordered…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Clark v. Albertville Nursing Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Roosevelt Thurmond v. Delta Well Surveyors, Gulf Oil Corp. v. Delta Well Surveyors and P & S Well Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Industrial Tile, Inc. v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Levence John Matte v. Zapata Offshore Company, Defendants/third Party v. Timco, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Drummond Co. v. Walter Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Hurst v. CookCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Lenihan v. Boeing Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
- Ex Parte Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Simmons v. Cudd Pressure ControlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.