Legal Opinion

People v. Scott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that County Court should have held a midtrial Wade hearing sua sponte. Defendant, represented by an Assistant Public Defender, requested and was granted a pretrial Wade hearing. Immediately before the hearing was to commence, defense counsel and the prosecutor agreed that the identification of defendant by bank personnel from a photograph taken by a bank camera was "confirmatory” and, therefore, that a hearing was unnecessary. At trial, however, a different Assistant Public Defender represented defendant and objected…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. PoblinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. People v. FrattaNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. People v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. People v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. SenkowskiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. People v. BoyerNew York Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API