Legal Opinion
Goosman v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 12, 1962No. Civ. 12590PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORTHROP, District Judge.
This is a tort action arising out of a collision between an automobile owned and operated by the plaintiff Goosman and a tractor-trailer owned by the two defendants Hill, leased by them to the defendant A. Duie Pyle, Inc., and driven by the defendant Anderson. The case was tried before a jury. During the course of this trial, the plaintiffs dismissed their cases against all of the defendants except the corporation, which had conceded that Anderson was acting as its agent. At the conclusion of the trial, the plaintiffs moved for directed verdicts in their favor on the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. YeattsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Greenfeld v. HookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Harper v. HiggsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Shelby v. Williams and Horney Livestock, Incorporated v. Joseph E. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Frederick Z. Goosman, to His Own Use and to the Use of Royal Indemnity Company, a Body Corporate v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc., a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Brown v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Dean v. RedmilesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Ramrattan v. Burger King Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1987
- Kopitzki v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.