Legal Opinion

Vaden v. Connecticut

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided July 8, 2008No. 3:06-cr-00071PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Redinno Vaden filed this suit against his former employer, the Connecticut Department of Corrections, to seek redress for what he alleges to be racial discrimination and a hostile work environment culminating in his termination. The defendants have moved for summary judgment on all counts, and for the reasons below, their motion will be granted.

I. Facts and Background

In Ms fourth amended complaint, Mr. Vaden advances three claims: a Fourteenth Amendment due process and equal protection claim under…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lee v. Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
  2. Wagner v. Connecticut Dep't. of CorrectionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
  3. Cortez v. Connecticut, Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
  4. O'Connell v. DeMartino (In re DeMartino)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  5. Sun v. Mashantucket Pequot Gaming EnterpriseDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API