Breeze v. Doyle
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the First District. Suit for money, the complaint containing two counts, as stated in the opinion of the Court, and the answer denying the allegations. Judgment for plaintiff on the findings. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.
Cope, J. concurring.
The only question which we deem important to consider upon the appeal, relates to the sufficiency of the findings. The case was tried by the Court without a jury, and its decision was as follows :
“1. That the material allegations in plaintiff’s complaint and replication are true.
2. That the material allegations in defendants’ answer are not true; and as conclusions of law, that there is now due and owing from said defendants to said plaintiff the sum of $2,856.91, for which plaintiff is entitled to have judgment against said defendants, together with the costs of this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McEwen v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Murphy v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Conlan v. GraceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.