Legal Opinion

Bullington v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 22, 1970No. 45528PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Presiding Judge.

Claimant contends that under the factual findings made by the board, the statutory defense of wilful misconduct (Code §114-105) on which the board based its conclusions, could not apply. In other words, having found that the employee’s injury aggravated a pre-existing but only moderate drinking problem and contributed to his death, it could not consistently find the advanced alcoholism to be voluntary or wilful misconduct on his part. Claimant discusses the modern medical view that alcoholism is a disease and invites an analogy to other aggravation of pre-existing…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Shiplett v. MoranCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  3. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. PrescottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dan River, Inc. v. ShinallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. U. S. Asbestos v. HammockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. McDonald v. Atlantic Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Bullington v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. Dan River, Inc. v. ShinallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API