Sciaky v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
We are of opinion that interest on the verdict should be added from the time the damage accrued. (See Weprin & Glass Building Corp. v. Rosoff Subway Constr. Co., 269 N. Y. 672.)
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division.
Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Pinch and Rippey, JJ., concur.
Judgment accordingly.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Weprin & Glass Building Corp. v. Rosoff Subway Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
3Cited by9 opinions
- Flamm v. NobleNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Kirk v. Pineville Mobile Homes, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
- Dowling v. StephanNew York Supreme Court · 1954
- Grobe v. KramerNew York Supreme Court · 1942
- Purcell v. Long Island Daily Press Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.