Kirk v. Pineville Mobile Homes, Inc.
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Justice:
In this appeal by Aster Kirk and Priscilla Kirk, they seek to recover prejudgment interest. They were awarded $54,000 by a jury in Wyoming County for damages to their home and personal property by virtue of a fire. The fire was caused by a defective heating device. The circuit court refused to award prejudgment interest because the Kirks had sought damages for annoyance and inconvenience. The circuit court reasoned that because the general verdict contained an element of damages that was not liquidated, the Kirks were not entitled to any prejudgment interest. We disagree and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- King v. McGuffTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Bond v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- Jarrett v. E. L. Harper & Son, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
- Young v. Extension Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1907
- Alabama Power Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bell v. Inland Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- Berry v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Mullins v. Harry's Mobile Homes, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1994
- Grove by and Through Grove v. MyersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- O'Neal v. Peake Operating Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.