Legal Opinion
Grobe v. Kramer
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 26, 1942PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNull, J.
This is an action in fraud. The jury found for the plaintiff and awarded damages for the value of certain shares of stock of which plaintiff’s assignor had been wrongfully deprived. The plaintiff has moved for an order directing that interest from the date of the fraud be added to the amount awarded by the jury.
Despite a background of much controversy, it is no longer open bo doubt that interest may be awarded in many actions in tort. (Wilson v. City of Troy, 135 N. Y. 96.) Interest has been allowed in actions of conversion (McIntyre v. Whitney, 139 App. Div. 557; affd., 201 N. Y. 526); of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- McAnarney v. Newark Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Faber v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Prager v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass Insurance Co. of NewarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Wilson v. . City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fort Wayne National Bank v. ScherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- United States v. Walters (In Re Walters)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
- Lesjac Realty Corp. v. MulhauserNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Popovich v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Continental Casualty Co. v. NovyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.