Legal Opinion
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Maynard
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 7, 1984No. Nos. 83AP-1014 through -1049PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtReilly, J.
These are appeals by the Director of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (hereinafter “director” or “OEPA”) from an order of the Environmental Board of Review (hereinafter “board” or “EBR”), which required the director to respond to public comments made in response to rule-making proposals and to adopt an administrative rule which would allow interested parties to petition the director to make changes in the rules governing the handling of hazardous waste in Ohio.
The director asserts four assignments of error, as follows:
“1. The Board erred in holding that it had jurisdiction to review…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Curtis v. DeCorpsOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Citizens Committee to Preserve Lake Logan v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
- Grape Growers, Vintners & Bottlers Ass'n v. Board of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
- In Re AmendmentsOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
- City of Middletown v. NicholsOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bartchy v. State Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Trans Rail America, Inc. v. EnyeartOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Dayton Power & Light Co. v. SchregardusOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Cecos International, Inc. v. ShankOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- U.S. Technology Corporation v. Korleski, 07ap-383 (11-6-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.