Legal Opinion

U.S. Technology Corporation v. Korleski, 07ap-383 (11-6-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 2007No. 07AP-383PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINON

{¶ 1} Appellant, US Technology Corporation ("UST"), appeals from a judgment of the Environmental Review Appeals Commission ("ERAC") dismissing appellant's appeal from the September 11, 2006 letter that a district representative of the Division of Hazardous Waste Management, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency ("OEPA") mailed to appellant. Appellant assigns a single error:

The September 11, 2006 correspondence from the Ohio EPA to US Technology Corporation concluding that Ohio law was violated was a final action appealable to the Environmental Review Appeals Commission ("ERAC") pursuant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. MaynardOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Dayton Power & Light Co. v. SchregardusOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trans Rail America, Inc. v. Enyeart, 07ap-273 (12-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Trans Rail America, Inc. v. Enyeart, 07ap-273 (12-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API