Flynn v. State

In special grounds one, tjro, four, and six the defendants amplify their contention in the .general grounds that the evidence does not authorize the verdict, and say that the circumstantial evidence which was introduced by the State, and upon which they were found guilty of possessing non-tax-paid liquor, was insufficient to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis save that of their guilt.

From the evidence and the statements of the defendants, which we have hereinbefore set out, the jury were authorized to find: that Marshall Bryant saw Plarlie Flynn and Odell Battle going out of the woods…