Legal Opinion
Sans v. Monticello Insurance
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 5, 1999No. 49A02-9807-CV-575PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge
Appellants-defendants Peter Sans (Sans) and Tick Tock Lounge, Inc. 1 (Tick Tock) appeal the trial court’s judgment that appellee-plaintiff Monticello Insurance Company (Monticello) had no duty to defend or indemnify Tick Tock or Michael E. Elkins (Elkins) under the insurance policy it issued. Specifically, Sans and Tick Tock 2 argue that the trial court erred in determining that: (1) they had the burden of proving there was coverage under the policy and (2) Monticello had no duty to defend or indemnify. 3
FACTS 4
Monticello issued a Special Multi-Peril Liability Policy (the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mitchell v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Lystarczyk v. SmitsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Sans v. Monticello Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Indiana Farmers Mutual Insurance v. EllisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- South Bend Community School Corp. v. National Education Ass'n-South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Collins v. McKinneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Wilson v. Continental Casualty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Bodemer v. Swanel Beverage, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2012
- Forman v. PennIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Weida v. KegariseIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.