Legal Opinion

Sheppard v. Andrews

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 1, 1970No. 7018SC33PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Appellants assign as error the allowance of the motion for nonsuit as to the feme defendant. In this we find no error. Options, being unilateral in nature and imposing upon the optionee no obligation to buy, are to be construed strictly in favor of the optionor. Accordingly, it is generally held that time is of the essence in such agreements, and conditions imposed therein must be strictly per formed in order to convert the optionee’s right to buy into a contract for sale. Ferguson v. Phillips, 268 N.C. 353, 150 S.E. 2d 518. The option agreement in the case before us expressly provided that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Norburn v. MacKieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Lane v. CoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Searcy v. . LoganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Trantham v. Elk Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Timber Co. v. . YarbroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nolan v. BoulwareCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Hayes v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Brooks v. HackneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Eward v. KalnenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API