Legal Opinion

State v. De La Rosa

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 20, 2019No. 20170993-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORME, Judge:

¶1 After a jury convicted him of one count of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute and one count of retail theft, defendant Jose De La Rosa, through post-conviction counsel, moved the court for a new trial pursuant to rule 24 of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure. He claimed entitlement to a new trial on five grounds: (1) the jury instruction on constructive possession was inadequate; (2) his prior drug possession and distribution convictions should not have been admitted at trial; (3) there was juror misconduct; (4) his retail theft charge should have…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. BarrettUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. TopanotesUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  5. ASC Utah, Inc. v. Wolf Mountain Resorts, L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Torres-OrellanaUtah Supreme Court · 2024
  2. Peterson v. Hyundai MotorCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  3. Provo City v. GedoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
  4. State v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026
  5. State v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API