Legal Opinion

Harlan v. State

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 30, 1973No. , 6589PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.

The question transferred for decision in this case is “whether a law enforcement officer who has arrested the operator of a motor vehicle for driving while intoxicated and who has followed the procedures of RSA 262-A:69-c is required to give a chemical test to the operator when the operator at first refuses but changes his mind one hour after such refusal and then requests the test.”

On August 6, 1972, the plaintiff was arrested and charged with driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor. She was informed by the arresting officer that unless she submitted to a breathalyzer test she…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Zidell v. BrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Krueger v. FultonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  4. State v. PetkusSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  5. State v. GallantSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Lund v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Toby Joseph Welch v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  4. Seders v. Powell, Comr. of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Peterson v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API