Legal Opinion
United States v. Toma
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 14, 1957No. 20360PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRISON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, United States of America, brings this action to recover amounts paid to defendant by plaintiff in alleged contravention of the dual compensation provisions of the Economy Act of 1932, 5 U.S.C.A. § 59a. Plaintiff alleges that there is due the United States from defendant the sum of $2,-757.58 for compensation paid to him as an employee of the Veterans’ Administration Hospital at Fort Howard, Maryland, at the rate of $3,000 per annum from July 1, 1951 to March 29, 1952 in the sum of $2,249.90 and at the rate of $3,300 per annum from March 30, 1952 to May 24,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Gemsco, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Wisconsin RR Comm. v. C., B. & QRR CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Belle C. Watman, as of the Last Will and Testament of Morris Watman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
- Belle C. Watman, as of the Last Will and Testament of Morris Watman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
- Belle C. Watman, as of the Last Will and Testament of Morris Watman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961