Legal Opinion · Dissent

Belle C. Watman, as of the Last Will and Testament of Morris Watman v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 1, 1961No. 189-59Published

1DissentJones, Chief Judge

The issue in this case is whether the plaintiff is relieved from the dual compensation provisions of the Economy Act of 1932 which limits the amount of retired pay that a civilian employee of the United States should receive as a commissioned military officer. Section 212 (a) of the Economy Act of June 30, 1932, 47 Stat. 382, 406, provides as follows:3

“(a) After the date of the enactment of this Act, no person holding a civilian office or position, appointive or elective, under the United States Government * * * shall be entitled, during the period of such incumbency, to retired pay from the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tanner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  2. Leonard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  3. United States v. TomaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API