Motz v. City of Akron
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWashburn, J.
Aaron Motz brought an action in the Summit Common Pleas against the city of Akron and the firm of Hollinger & Davidson, contractors, for the purpose of recovering damages by reason of injuries sustained by him.
The city decided to construct a sewer in one of its streets and by arrangement with Hol1 nger & Davidson, a trench was dug and later rufLled with loose dirt which was then flushed with water and left in a muddy condition without lights or guards. One McGown was driving his horse along said street and said horse fell into the ditch and was unable to ex-trícate itself. Certain firemen of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tabor v. Continental Baking CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
- Springsteel v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1963
- Erie County United Bank v. BerkOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
- Acker v. McGinleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1934