Acker v. McGinley

*102OPINION

By WASHBURN, PJ.

It is claimed that both Acker and Beidleman were negligent in the creation of the condition which confronted the driver of the McGinley car, and that Mrs. McGinley was in no way guilty of contributory negligence, and we find that the evidence in the record supports such claims and warranted the jury in finding on such issues in favor of the plaintiff, Mrs. McGinley. ■ .

It is strenuously urged, however, that such negligence of Acker and- Beidleman was not the proximate or even a proximate cause of plaintiff’s injuries; that when the driver of the McGinley car approached…