Legal Opinion

Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Humphries

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 9, 1954No. 35111PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.

Essential to the recovery of compensation, under the provisions of our Workmen’s Compensation Act, is that the relationship of employee and employer exist between the claimant and the person against whom the award is entered.

The Compensation Act defines an employer as follows: “ ‘Employer’ shall include . . . any municipal corporation within the State, and any political division thereof, and any individual, firm, association, or corporation engaged in any business operated for gain or profit, except as hereinafter provided, and the receiver or trustee of the same, . . . and the legal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SumrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. CurrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. PeekCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. CloreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Corbin v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Lockhart v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Lewis Wood Preserving Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  4. Rosser v. Meriwether CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. Travelers Insurance Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API