Legal Opinion

Huston v. Neil

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1873PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from the Fayette Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

—This was an action by the appellee against the appellants to obtain a partition of certain real estate.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff was a tenant in common with the defendants in lot fifty-one of Conner’s first plat in the original plat of the town of Connersville, Fayette county, Indiana; that on the 27th day of April, 1855, one Joshua Bates and one Edward Neil purchased said real estate from the Junction Railroad Company, which company, by proper deed, conveyed said property to Bates and Neil; that at the time said conveyance was made to said Bates and Neil, she was the lawful…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Schæffer v. FithianIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Matlock v. MatlockIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Dean v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Holland v. FullerIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Walling v. BurgessIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Grissom v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Western Securities Co. v. AtleeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  4. Cobble v. TomlinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Morgan v. OlveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API