Legal Opinion

Yellow Truck & Coach Mfg. Co. v. Edmondson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 13, 1946No. 10133PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

The appellant complains of a judgment rendered against it at the suit of plant protection employees for overtime pay and penalties in pursuance of § 7(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 207(a). The Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division supports the judgment and has filed a brief as amicus curiae.

*368The plant protection employees of the appellant were organized into three shifts, each working 8 hours a day for 6 days a week. In addition to the 8 hours per day spent on active plant protection duty the guards were required to report before going to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Verco IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1947
  3. Verco Industries v. Spartan PlasticsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Klinghoffer Bros. Realty Corp., Irving Jacobson and Albert KlinghofferCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  5. United States v. Klinghoffer Bros. Realty Corp., Irving Jacobson and Albert KlinghofferCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API