Legal Opinion

Matter of Fleischer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 28, 1986Published

1Opinion of the Court

102 N.J. 440 (1986)

508 A.2d 1115

IN THE MATTER OF EDWARD L. FLEISCHER, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

IN THE MATTER OF H. BARRY SHULTZ, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

IN THE MATTER OF JAY L. SCHWIMER, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 24, 1984.

Decided May 28, 1986.

David E. Johnson, Jr., Director, argued the cause for the Office of Attorney Ethics.

Justin P. Walder argued the cause for respondents (Walder, Sondak, Berkeley & Brogan, attorneys; Justin P. Walder and Dominic J. Aprile on the brief).

2Per curiam

These disciplinary proceedings involve three respondents, who constitute all the members of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Matter of NoonanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. In Re GavelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  5. In Re SearsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API