Legal Opinion

Hunn v. Windsor Hotel Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1937No. 8597PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, Judge :

Damages for personal injuries are sought in this action. A trial was had and after both sides rested, the court directed a verdict for defendant.

Upon the directed verdict, plaintiff is entitled to have the evidence considered favorably to her. Potts v. Union Co., 75 W. Va. 212, 83 S. E. 918. Under such consideration, the case would appear as follows: The defendant operates a hotel in the City of Wheeling and plaintiff has lodged at the hotel for the last eight years. The day before the injury complained of, defendant replaced the treads on a short flight of marble steps which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co. v. O'BrienIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Miner v. Connecticut River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Gover v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1922
  5. Brandt v. RakauskasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Matthews v. Cumberland & Allegheny Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Spurlin v. NardoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Englehardt v. PhilippsOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Schrader v. KrieselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Grossnickle v. Village of GermantownOhio Supreme Court · 1965

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API