Legal Opinion
Blackman v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 10, 2001No. CIV. A. 97-1629(PLF), CIV. A. 97-2402(PLF)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
On September 13, 2000, the Court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order awarding plaintiff Michael Edmonds $32,709.25 in attorneys’ fees and costs. The Court ordered defendants to pay a portion of the attorneys’ fees and all of the costs immediately and stayed the payment of the remainder of the fee award “pending the outcome of the Petties appeal and/or until the [fee] cap [enacted by Congress] expires or is repealed.” Blackman v. District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 97-1629, Opinion at 3 (D.D.C. Sept. 13, 2000). Plaintiff seeks payment of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Calloway v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Blackman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Walker v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Nikita Shonta Petties,appellees v. District of Columbia,appellantsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kaseman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Blackman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Watkins v. VanceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Blackman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Petties v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.