Legal Opinion

Calloway v. District of Columbia

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 30, 2000No. 99-5215, 99-5216PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.

Separate opinion dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG.

TATEL, Circuit Judge:

A rider to the District of Columbia Appropriations Act imposes limits on fees the District may pay under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, known as IDEA, to attorneys who represent prevailing parties in actions against the D.C. Public Schools. In this suit by disabled students and their parents, the district *3court rejected challenges to the fee cap, finding -it neither preempted by IDEA nor contrary to the Due Process Clause of the Fifth…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Cedric Johnson v. George M. Daley, and United States of America, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Kaseman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  3. United States v. Braxtonbrown-SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  4. A.C. Ex Rel. Clark v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  5. Kaseman v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API