Legal Opinion

The Radnor

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided October 18, 1927No. 1530PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, District Judge.

The question involved in this ease is the responsibility for the foundering of a tow. The material facts are, briefly stated, as follows:

The libelant, owner of the houseboat Manetta, on or about December 13, 1926, employed the steam tug Radnor to tow the houseboat from Baltimore harbor to the harbor of Easton, Md. In the course of the undertaking, the houseboat filled with water and was almost completely submerged, as a result of which the tug was unable to complete its undertaking and was compelled to put into the port of Annapolis, and there beach the houseboat.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southgate v. Eastern Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  2. The Arctic BirdDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1901
  3. The Lizzie M. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925
  4. Curtis Bay Towing Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925
  5. The Senator RiceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Curtis Bay Towing Co. Of Virginia, Inc. v. Southern Lighterage Corp. The J. Alvah Clark. The Covered WagonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  2. C. E. Hart v. Thomas BlakemoreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Frederick Snare Corp. v. Moran Towing & Transportation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  4. In Re Coastal Carriers Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1991
  5. Valentine Waterways Corporation v. Tug ChoptankDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API