Satterfield v. Winston Industries, Inc.

Windal S. Satterfield filed a motion pursuant to Rule 60(b)(4), (5), and (6), A.R.Civ.P., and what he termed an "independent action" alleging fraud on the court, seeking to have the judgment that had been previously rendered against him set aside. The trial court considered the motion and the "action" together and ruled on them in one judgment;1 it denied relief and Satterfield appealed. We affirm.

Winston Industries, Inc. ("Winston"), sued Satterfield in May 1972 and secured a judgment against him on April 18, 1973. On April 27, 1981, Winston again sued Satterfield, also naming his children…