Legal Opinion

Cassioppi v. Damico

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 18, 1988No. 87-965PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph Cassioppi appeals from the trial court's denial of his Rule 60(b), Ala.R.Civ.P., motion to set aside a default judgment in the amount of $70,000 entered in favor of Ross John Damico. We affirm.

Damico agreed to purchase certain game tables and game machines (hereinafter referred to as "games") from Leisure Time Electronics, Inc. Leisure Time represented to Damico that if, within 18 months from the date of purchase, the games did not yield a 100% return of the initial investment, they could be returned and Damico would be reimbursed the difference between the initial purchase price and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kirtland v. Fort Morgan Auth. Sewer Serv., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Ex Parte Hartford Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Textron, Inc. v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Raine v. First Western BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Ex Parte American Resources Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. Ex Parte Full Circle Distribution, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Neal v. NealSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Satterfield v. Winston Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. DaLee v. Crosby Lumber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API