Legal Opinion
Ruben Condenser Co. v. Aerovox Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 28, 1934No. 7002PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is a patent suit.
Plaintiffs are seeking relief by injunction and money damages for the alleged infringement by the defendant of patent No. 1,891,-207, issued to Samuel Ruben, assignor by mesne assignments to Ruben Condenser Company, for electrolytic condenser, dated December 13,1032, on an application filed June 19, 1930.
The plaintiff Ruben Condenser Company is the owner of said patent, and the plaintiff P. R. Mallory & Co., Incorporated, is the exclusive licensee under said patent.
The plaintiff Ruben Condenser Company is the owner of other patents of Samuel…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- American Stainless Steel Co. v. Ludlum Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Converse v. Portsmouth Cotton Oil Refining Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
- Aerovox Corp. v. Concourse Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Eakins v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1930
3Cited by2 opinions
- Aerovox Corp. v. Micamold Radio Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1936
- Aerovox Corp. v. Dubilier Condenser Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938