Legal Opinion
Eickhorst v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 11, 1990No. 88 Civ. 3002 (RJW), 88 Civ. 7473 (RJW)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Defendant, the E.F. Hutton Group, Inc. (“Hutton”), has moved to dismiss the amended complaints against it in the above-captioned cases pursuant to Rules 9(b) and 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P. 1 Plaintiffs in the Eickhorst action have moved to further amend the complaint to add an additional plaintiff. For the reasons that follow, the motion to dismiss the amended complaints is granted in part and denied in part, and the motion to amend the complaint in the Eickhorst action is granted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs consist of one hundred-eighty-one (181)…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,590 David Segal v. Lawrence Gordon, and Coburn Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Luce v. EdelsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Ross v. A. H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Stratton Oakmont, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Rusyniak v. GensiniDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Boettcher & Co., Inc. v. MunsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Keenan v. D.H. Blair & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Coleman & Co. Securities, Inc. v. Giaquinto Family TrustDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.