Legal Opinion

Slavick v. State, Department of Transportation

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1988No. 86AP-1057PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBowman, J.

In the summer of 1983, appellee, Ohio Department of Transportation (“ODOT”), decided to resurface State Route 94 between Sharon Center and State Route 18. Accordingly, ODOT entered into a contract with the Lerkis Paving Company for surface repair and resurfacing operations. Work began on September 19, 1983, when “Road Construction Traffic Maintained” signs were placed at the beginning and end of the project, as well as at each intersecting road on the project.

State Route 94 is a straight, two-lane road with a mild upgrade which gives the appearance of being flat; however, the road has a dip…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Knickel v. Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Moore v. Columbus CityOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Becker v. NoldOhio Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rhodus v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. White v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Pollock v. State Highway & Transportation DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. O'Brien v. Dept. of Transp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Cook v. StevensOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API