Legal Opinion

United States v. Robin G. Lamont

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 9, 2003No. 00-30220PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge.

Once again we are asked to delineate the appropriate scope of criminal law power as it is reposed within the federal government: this time, whether, under the general federal arson statute, setting fire to a church constitutes a federal offense. We hold that ordinarily it does not.

Appellant Robin Lamont entered a conditional guilty plea to committing arson with respect to the Subud church in Spokane, Washington. On appeal, Lamont argues that the application of the federal arson statute, 18 U.S.C. § 844(i), to the church represents an unconstitutional exercise…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. Brian Francis JoyceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Todd R. DaviesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Vilches-NavarreteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. GillespieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. Kyocera Corp. v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API