United States v. William E. Cambra, Jr., AKA B.C.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
William E. Cambra, Jr. plead guilty on April 17, 1990, to three counts of violating the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. He appeals his sentence of 24 months plus one year of supervised release, claiming the district court should have applied the sentencing guideline relating to food and drug offenses, U.S.S.G. § 2N2.1, rather than the one for fraud and deceit, § 2F1.1. In the alternative, Cambra claims the district court improperly enhanced his sentence based on the dollar amount of the fraud. We conclude that the district court applied the correct guidelines and affirm.
I
A…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Linda LockardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Bernard D. BosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. James A. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. HopperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Billy Lee ArlenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Dulal ChatterjiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. McENRYCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brenda KUKU, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.