Legal Opinion
United States v. James A. Bradshaw
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided March 25, 1988No. 86-6019PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
The appellant, James Bradshaw, appeals his conviction for violating the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the “FDC Act” or the “Act”). 21 U.S.C. §§ 301-392. The various acts that constitute criminal violations of the FDC Act are set forth in 21 U.S.C. § 331. All of these violations are misdemeanors regardless of the violator’s intent. 21 U.S.C. § 333(a). A violation of the Act becomes a felony if it is a second offense or if it is committed with “intent to defraud or mislead.” 21 U.S.C. § 333(b). The principal issue on this appeal is whether the intent requirement…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Greyhound Corp. v. Mt. Hood Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Joe E. GrissomCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Moshe MilsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Billy Lee ArlenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Joann MitcheltreeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Shontay DessartCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. James T. KimballCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.