Legal Opinion
Anniston Lumber & Mfg. Co. v. Kirkland
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 20, 1929No. 7 Div. 892PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The demurrer to the bill was overruled.
The bill as amended was filed under the general equitable doctrine of interpleader, or in the nature of interpleader. Section 10390, Code of 1928. The rules governing such pleading are stated in Marsh v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 200 Ala. 438, 76 So. 370; Cloud v. Dean, 212 Ala. 305, 102 So. 437; Alexander City Bank v. Home Ins. Co., 214 Ala. 544, 108 So. 369; Johnson v. Blackmon, 201 Ala. 537, 78 So. 891; Awbrey v. Estes, 216 Ala. 66, 112 So. 529; Schrader Co. v. A. Z. Bailey Groc. Co., 15 Ala. App. 647, 74 So. 749; Scott v. Parker, 216 Ala. 321, 113 So.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Awbrey v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Crass v. Memphis & Charleston RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Marsh v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Sturdavant v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Finn v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- First Nat. Bank of Mobile v. BurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Robertson Banking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Byrum Hardware Co. v. Jenkins Bldg. Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Williams v. American Nat. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.