State v. Rowling
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals a judgment convicting him of unlawful use of a weapon, ORS 166.220, and menacing, ORS 163.190, raising three assignments of error. We reject without discussion defendant’s two assignments of error raised in his supplemental brief and write only to address the single assignment of error raised in his opening brief. In that assignment, defendant asserts that the trial court plainly erred in imposing a $500 unitary assessment on the menacing conviction because the statute that provided for that assessment was repealed effective January 1, 2012, before defendant committed the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. QuadeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SasserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. CaroClackamas County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
- State v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. Roman-GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014