Legal Opinion

Cullin v. Foxley

California Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1939No. L. A. No. 17185PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

Motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was taken too late.

The moving papers show that the action was brought to foreclose a mortgage on real property executed by the defendant Foxley. Judgment of foreclosure was entered on May 28, 1938, and written notice of entry of judgment was served on June 4, 1938, and filed on June 6, 1938. On June 14, 1938, the defendant filed a notice of intention to move for a new trial as to which no decision has ever been made by the trial court. The defendant filed a notice of appeal from the judgment on April 6, 1939.

The certificate of the clerk of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lehmer v. Scott & Borden, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. TranthamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API