Dockery Ex Rel. Pullen v. World of Mirth Shows, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtMoose, J.
Defendant Mirth asserts that the negligence, if any, giving rise to plaintiff’s fall and injuries consisted of acts and omissions of Dembrosky, an independent contractor, and the conduct of plaintiff in standing while the Scrambler was in motion.
In response to an issue submitted by the court, the jury determined that Dembrosky was not an agent or employee of Mirth. An employer is not ordinarily liable for injury resulting from dangerous conditions collaterally created by the negligence of an independent contractor. But where it is reasonably foreseeable that harmful consequences will arise…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Richmond & Manchester Railway Co. v. Moore's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
- Kahalili v. Rosecliff Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Evans v. . Rockingham Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Brown v. Columbia Amusement Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1931
- Johnstone v. Panama Pacific International Exposition Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Medley v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Aaser v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Deitz v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Allred v. Capital Area Soccer League, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.