Legal Opinion

Espindola v. Barber

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 29, 1957No. Civ. No. 7429PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALBERT, District Judge.

Plaintiff has instituted this action in this Court for an adjudication of his. *830citizenship status under the provisions of Title 8 U.S.C.A. § 1503, and Title 28 U.S. C.A. § 2201. The case has been submitted to the Court on an agreed statement of facts; the only issue being one of law.

Plaintiff is the illegitimate son of Imelda G. Tovias who became a naturalized citizen of the United States on March 7, 1950, in thé Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Sacramento. Plaintiff was born in Mexico on October 22, 1935. His father, an alien, never…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Dominador Dimapilis Aure v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. Yanish v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  4. In re Naturalization Filed by Howard ex rel. ApplegarthDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1956

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Javier Ontoniel Bustamante-Barrera v. Alberto R. Gonzales, U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  2. Nehme v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  3. Joaquin Augusto Peignand v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  4. PIKKARAINENBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1963
  5. LBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API