Legal Opinion

Dominador Dimapilis Aure v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 9, 1955No. 14476PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYRNE, District Judge.

Aure is a native of the Philippine Islands and there enlisted in the United States Navy on April 10, 1946. His naval service has been continuous since that date. He first entered the United States in November, 1946, as a member of the crew of a U. S. Navy vessel and in that capacity has made numerous trips to this country, but has never been admitted for permanent residence.

On August 26, 1953, Aure filed in the District Court a petition for naturalization, claiming the exemptions of Public Law 86, 83rd Congress, enacted June 30, 1953, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1440a, as a member of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Hallowell v. CommonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Shomberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. De La Rama Steamship Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Yuen Jung v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re Pauschert's PetitionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  2. Espindola v. BarberDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
  3. BARTHELEMY v. RAY McDERMOTT & COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. In re Naturalization of CarnavasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  5. In re Naturalization of PinnerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API