Nehme v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUHÉ, Circuit Judge:
In this case we are called upon primarily to decide whether Congress complied with the Constitution’s mandate of uniformity when it established the rules of derivative naturalization under former § 321 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1432 (2000). We hold that Congress has done so, and that Petitioner has failed to prove that he was ever naturalized under this or any other section of the INA. Petitioner is therefore an alien, and because he is removable by reason of having committed an aggravated felony, we lack jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mathews v. DiazSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Odiri Nkofi Bagot v. John Ashcroft James Ziglar Kenneth ElwoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Fernandez-Bernal v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Leszek Hughes, A.K.A. Thomas Lloyd Hughes, A.K.A. Tom v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Javier Ontoniel Bustamante-Barrera v. Alberto R. Gonzales, U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Castellanos-Contreras v. Decatur Hotels, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.