United States v. Peter Pi Cor-Bon Custom Bullet Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONTIE, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-appellants, Peter Pi and Cor-Bon Custom Bullet Company, appeal the district court’s refusal to dismiss the indictment in this case. For the following-reasons, we affirm the district court.
I
Since 1990, defendant Peter Pi, through his company and co-defendant Cor-Bon Custom Bullet Company (“Cor-Bon”), has been in the business of manufacturing ammunition for firearms. In 1995, an employee of Cor-Bon brought to the attention of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (“ATF”) the fact that Cor-Bon, under the direction of Mr. Pi, had been significantly…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. George Blair (98-2051) and Connie Blair, Also Known as Launa Maikowski (99-1626)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Ronald D. GrenobleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Iwan MandyczCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Garib-BazainCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Walls v. HemingwayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.