Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. George Blair (98-2051) and Connie Blair, Also Known as Launa Maikowski (99-1626)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 26, 2000No. 98-2051, 99-1626PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J., joined by Bell, D. J.,

CLAY, J. (pp. 702-07), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

OPINION

COLE, Circuit Judge.

George and Connie Blair were convicted of various drug and money laundering charges and sentenced to lengthy terms of imprisonment. The Blairs now appeal their convictions; George also appeals his sentence. Specifically, George argues that the district court erred: by denying his motion to suppress evidence; by denying his motion to dismiss the original indictment based on the composition of the grand jury; by denying his motion to vacate his sentence based on “promises”…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Russell Marcilis, II v. Township of RedfordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Christopher FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Albert WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Sean CarterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API