United States v. Iwan Mandycz
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellee, the United States, moves to dismiss the interlocutory appeal of Defendant-Appellant, Iwan Mandycz, for lack of jurisdiction. Because the district court’s denial of Mandycz’s motion for summary judgment was not a “final order” of the district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we dismiss Mandycz’s interlocutory appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
In the underlying complaint, the Government seeks Mandycz’s denaturalization based on his alleged service at two Nazi-run labor camps during World War II. In the district court, Mandycz moved for summary…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mark Campbell v. Cheatham County Sheriff's Dep'tCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Iwan MandyczCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- O.K. v. BushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- United States v. No RunnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In Re the Care & Treatment of SykesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.