Legal Opinion

United States v. Iwan Mandycz

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 4, 2004No. 02-1846PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellee, the United States, moves to dismiss the interlocutory appeal of Defendant-Appellant, Iwan Mandycz, for lack of jurisdiction. Because the district court’s denial of Mandycz’s motion for summary judgment was not a “final order” of the district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we dismiss Mandycz’s interlocutory appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

In the underlying complaint, the Government seeks Mandycz’s denaturalization based on his alleged service at two Nazi-run labor camps during World War II. In the district court, Mandycz moved for summary…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mark Campbell v. Cheatham County Sheriff's Dep'tCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
  2. United States v. Iwan MandyczCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. O.K. v. BushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  4. United States v. No RunnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. In Re the Care & Treatment of SykesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API